Governor’s Race Highlighted by Contrasting Ideas

In spite of all the campaign rhetoric generated in this election season, Hoosiers vote November 4^th to elect the next governor. This decision, between incumbent Mitch Daniels, challenger Jill Long-Thompson and Libertarian candidate Andy Horning, is important to the future of Indiana residents and the state's economic health.

After attending a gubernatorial debate, it became apparent that the choices in this election are clear-cut. Voters must choose between a person who values larger size and activity of government in the lives of individuals, a person who wants to limit government, and one who supports government only as outlined by the Constitution. Challenger Jill Long-Thompson continually indicated her plan to expand the role of government, while Governor Daniels and challenger Andy Horning commented about the limited role government should hold in the lives of individuals.

Without disrespecting Mr. Horning, he stands little chance to win in a state so carefully divided between the two major parties, perhaps to our detriment.

As I listened to challenger Thompson, it became clear that she knows how to go on the offensive. At every opportunity, instead of clearly defining her proposals, she used much of her time attack Governor Daniels. It is true that many debates lend themselves to be little more than political word duels, but it is worth noting that Ms. Long-Thompson threw so many punches that she seemed to miss the opportunity to explain her positions.

For example, one position mentioned was her idea of extending the high school graduation requirement from four years to five. According to her, this would allow more young people to graduate high school. This is an example of the type of thinking that limits the possibilities of those who need educational challenge the most. How does lowering the standard for high school graduation help our students compete in a global economy? We would have to be the only industrialized nation on earth that would even consider such a thing. Rather than address the reasons why our students drop out or do poorly in high school, let us just extend their stay. What message are we sending concerning the value of education?

In contrast, Governor Daniels supports giving parents more freedom of educational choices for their children, instead of a mandatory sentence to failing schools. One survey concludes that over 80% of black parents who live in urban areas, support school choice. These parents know and believe that quality education helps break the cycle of poverty much more so than lowering the standard.

Concerning economic proposals, Ms. Long-Thompson supports creating a "tier system" that divides each county's economic incentive packages based on need. On the surface, this may sound impressive, but it is actually easier to create an environment that advances job creation and economic growth statewide. Conversely, Governor Daniels has repeatedly stated and supported business economic packages that make Indiana number one in the Midwest and number twelve nationally for business climate. This means dropping the cost of doing business with lower taxes to spur job creation and economic growth. Any first year economic student knows that businesses expand in an environment of low taxes and increasing profit. No one goes into business with the idea of not making money.

Finally, after over seventy trips to Northwest Indiana, it is clear that Governor Daniels has made good on his belief that the success of Indiana hinges on the success of the Northwest region. From educational options, to improved roads and infrastructure, our Governor bears consideration to finish what he started.